In

My first photomontage work!



This photomontage is made up of over 10 images from various sources, from photography to printed images on magazine. They are placed together to form a sequence of images and going to be explored in ideological approach, to critique the two major ideologies:
Gender Stereotype and Beauty Standard Discourse reproduced in adverts.

            Notion of staging images in combination to create particular effects or to construct narratives is called montage. According to Jay and Dimenderg(1994), the bourgeois conception of photomontage means that the artiest and craftsman are replaced by the engineer. Pieces of photographs are pasted together the way parts of machines are joined together with screws. At the same time, montage is a work of art that offers completely new opportunities with regard to content. By putting individual images together, their connotative meaning changes at the same time. Barthes (1977) developed the idea of denotation and connotation, by reading the montage with these two elements and the signs; this enables the print to influence readers on a new ideological level.

            Photomontage is mainly practicable in two forms, political propaganda and commercial advertising. The first one is the Dadaist, began from a point of view incontestable for them: that the painting of the way period, post-futurist expressionism, ect, member of Club Dada usually held more or less left-wing political views, it was a kind of cultural criticism. This photomontage, although it is not a political criticism but is about culture, therefore the way and approach to analysis will be similar to that of Dadaist.  
.
.
.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
            To begin with, since this montage acts as a tool to critique the gender stereotype, there are lots of culturally classified as feminine images being put together with men, like flower at the side, lipsticks, red lip emoji, princess emoji, jewelleries, skinny tag and the purple colour toned background of a salon. Nevertheless, there are two extracts from X-Men about same sex marriage that communicates with the contradiction between gender expectations. By combining images that seem contradict to each other can actually construct narratives to increase people awareness to this ideology. 

            One of ideologies expressed in the montage is the gender stereotype. Ideology is a form of false consciousness, it is a mistaken worldview that served the interest of the capitalist class, and we believe that these views are universally true- natural and obvious. (Marx, 1972) By correlating lipsticks with men, the denotation as literal images carry the connotation as symbolic meaning of challenging the gender stereotype, as lipsticks are culturally defined as feminine product and especially these images are taken from the women magazine- Glamour but now they are applied on men. (Barthes 1977). The combination of these images, although contradict with each other’s, they make fun of the norm and catch readers’ attention. Through this contradiction, it helps illustrating the idea that people cannot accept things out of the mainstream, like ‘Drag queens’, men wearing women’s clothing, heavy makeup and wigs, they are stereotypically viewed to be gay men. (Butler, 1990) What’s more, by looking at the smile on the Kinda Kids, we see that it is not a problem for men to put on makeup. That therefore the ideology of gender stereotype is a false consciousness that is created by the society and waiting to be enlightened.

            In like manner, beauty is also categorised by the stereotype. The sequence in the middle of the montage that starts with the monkey to Ken, Barbie’s boyfriend symbolises the evolution of human history, carrying connotation that beauty standard has changed throughout the time. As we see the sculptures on top, the masculinity is said to be the ideal body shape for men (Goffmen, 1990), especially those with beard, however, looking at Ken, has no facial hair, flawless skin and relatively skinny body, this means that stereotype of men’s appearances has transform to another type.  

            Talking into flawless skin, with the advance technology, more and more people would perform plastic surgery to achieve what the society think is beauty. This montage is trying to express that not only female would do plastic but also men. There is a Botox vaccine on the third Kinda kid face and by following the sequence, Ken can be said as the result of an ideal man. In real, there is actually a man that has come forward saying he did 100 surgeries so that he could become a living Ken doll to reach the goal of ‘ideal beauty’. (Dailymail, 2012) These signs imply that people nowadays become more open-minded on aesthetic medical treatment and at the same time, the ultimate goal is to turn themselves into ideal individuals in term of appearance under the gender stereotype.  

            When considering gender expectations, gay marriage and homosexual have always been the first to be discussed. The two X-Men images of same sex marriage are put in the montage to emphasise the denial of gender expectation. By choosing X-Men’s, it empowers the effect, as Marvel is one of the most popular entertainment companies nowadays who is targeting all age groups and all gender. The two homosexual characters appear to be getting married here represent a huge acceptance of public toward same sex marriage. The ‘:o’ emoji put on the bottom resembles the public reaction when they first received the news. The signs are to remind readers that the society should not be limited by the gender expectation; everyone has the right to be with the one they love.

            On the other hand, beauty standard is strongly shaped by discourse and this ideology is reproduced mainly in adverts. In the montage, there is a 30% less fat text and the reason for that to be there is to critique how advert plays an important role in proceeding what is beauty to the public. They define beauty as slim and having a healthy image, in order to achieve these, consumer should purchase the commodities they are selling like the fat free yogurt, skimmed milk, organic food, etc. This 30% fat free tag also communicates with the toned and fat free body shape of Ken to emphasise the influence of discourse.

            By putting the Botox vaccine and Ken in the montage, it reflects the ideal face ratio. Given the discourse of what classified as beauty, the golden face ratio of 1: 1.618 and perfect skin are another major requirements. (Meisner, 2013) These are mostly being reproduced in magazine like Glamour or Elle, by telling readers what is beauty; they are indirectly pushing them to do plastic surgery or other similar kind of treatments in order to fit in the group.


            At the end, according Hall(1999), ‘things in themselves rarely if ever have any more single, fixed and unchanging meaning, It is by our use of things, and what we say, think and feel about them, how we represent them that we give them a meaning. In part, we give objects, people and events meaning by the framework or interpretation, which we bring them. In part we give things meaning by how we represent them’. In this case, I represent the images as form of photomontage that form a sequences and combination, producing different denotation and connotation, including different signs and codes that critique the ideology, ‘they are nothing more but the ways of representing, hence, shaping the world’ (Sobocincki, 2001), this enable the criticism to influence readers on a whole new ideological level.  However, readers may have different interpretation on the montage with the producer, both may come along with strong arguments and references, no one can any longer tell which meaning is the correct one.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Bibliography:
Barthes, R. and Heath, S. (1977). Image, music, text. New York: Hill and Wang.

Butler, J. (1999). Gender trouble. New York: Routledge.

Evans, J. and Hall, S. (1999). Visual culture. London: SAGE Publications in association with the Open University.

Goffman, E. (1971). The Presentation of Self in everyday Life. London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press.

Kaes, A., Jay, M. and Dimendberg, E. (1994). The Weimar Republic Sourcebook. 2nd ed. California: University of California Press, pp.652-653.

Mail Online, (2012). Man spends $100,000 on nearly 100 plastic surgery operations to become 'real life Ken doll'. [online] Available at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2249213/Real-life-Ken-doll-Justin-Jedlica-spends-100k-nearly-100-plastic-surgery-operations.html [Accessed 16 Feb. 2015].

Marx, K., Engels, F., Arthur, C. and Marx, K. (1972). The German ideology. New York: International Publishers.

Meisner, G. (2013). Facial Beauty and the “New” Golden Ratio (or is it just 1.618?). [online] Phi 1.618: The Golden Number. Available at: http://www.goldennumber.net/facial-beauty-new-golden-ratio/ [Accessed 16 Feb. 2015].

Sobocinski, M. (2001). Ideology in Images- We are being framed. 1st ed. [ebook] pp.23-29. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/191707/Ideology_in_Images_-_We_Are_Being_Framed_Analysis_of_Press_Photography_Films_Posters_and_WW2_Propaganda_Posters_ [Accessed 16 Feb. 2015].

Related Articles

ShanikeC. Powered by Blogger.